Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing Co.

1973 United States Supreme Court case
Espinoza v. Farah Mfg. Co.
Argued October 10–11, 1973
Decided November 19, 1973
Full case nameEspinoza, et vir v. Farah Manufacturing Company
Citations414 U.S. 86 (more)
94 S. Ct. 334; 38 L. Ed. 2d 287
Holding
An employer's refusal to hire a person because he is not a United States citizen does not constitute employment discrimination on the basis of "national origin" in violation of §703 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.[1]
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William O. Douglas · William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun
Lewis F. Powell Jr. · William Rehnquist
Case opinions
MajorityMarshall, joined by Burger, Brennan, Stewart, White, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist
DissentDouglas
Part of a series on
Chicanos and Mexican Americans
Mexican America
Terms
Identity
  • Chola/o
  • La Raza
  • Pachuca
  • Pachuco
  • Pinta/o
  • Xicanx
Concepts
  • Anti-Mexican sentiment
Early-American Period
Pre-Chicano Movement
Chicano Movement
Post-Chicano Period
Population
  • flag United States portal
  • Category
  • Index
  • v
  • t
  • e

Espinoza v. Farah Mfg. Co., 414 U.S. 86 (1973), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that an employer's refusal to hire a person because he is not a United States citizen does not constitute employment discrimination on the basis of "national origin" in violation of §703 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.[1]

Espinoza, a Mexican national admitted to residence in the United States and married to a U.S. national, brought suit after exhausting her administrative remedies with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, alleging that Farah Mfg. Company's refusal to hire her in its San Antonio, Texas division because of her Mexican citizenship violated §703 of the Civil Rights Act, which makes it an unlawful employment practice for an employer to fail or refuse to hire any individual because of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

The District Court granted Espinoza's motion for summary judgment, relying primarily on an EEOC guideline providing that a lawful alien resident may not be discriminated against on the basis of citizenship. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed, and the Supreme Court affirmed this decision.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b "Civil Rights Act of 1964". Archived from the original on October 21, 2010. Retrieved October 6, 2008.

Further reading

  • Limon, G. (1975). "Discrimination against Aliens in Federal Public Employment". Chicano Law Review. 2: 109.
  • Soltero, Carlos R. (2006). "Espinoza v. Farah Mfg. Co. (1973) and 'national origin' discrimination in employment". Latinos and American Law: Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. pp. 95–106. ISBN 978-0-292-71411-3.

External links

  • Text of Espinoza v. Farah Mfg. Co., 414 U.S. 86 (1973) is available from: CourtListener  Google Scholar  Justia 
  • v
  • t
  • e
Terms
Pre-Chicano Movement
Chicano Movement
Post-Chicano Movement
Culture
Chicana/o Theory
Supreme Court cases
By city and region
Lists
  • Category:Chicano
  • Category:American people of Mexican descent


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e